LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (News release)- The American Civil Liberties Union, the Innocence Project, the ACLU of Arkansas, Hogan Lovells US LLP, and Little Rock attorney John Tull today filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in state court on behalf of Patricia Young, the sister of Ledell Lee. The lawsuit asks the court to order the city of Jacksonville, Ark. to release DNA and fingerprints found at the scene of the crime — which do not match Lee’s — so that they can be tested and run through national databases for the first time. This comes as new analysis from top forensic experts provides reason to believe Lee may have been executed for a crime he did not commit.
Lee was executed on April 20, 2017 for the 1993 murder of Debra Reese. He maintained his innocence from the time of his arrest until his execution. When the Innocence Project and the ACLU were brought in to work on his case less than two weeks before his execution, they immediately identified serious flaws in the evidence used to convict him. They also identified DNA evidence that likely belonged to the killer and had never been tested with modern technology. The courts refused to hear any new evidence or allow DNA testing before executing Lee, who was one of eight people scheduled for execution in rapid succession because of the state’s expiring supply of execution drugs.
“My family has been unable to rest for the last two and a half years, knowing that my brother was murdered by the state of Arkansas for a crime we believe he did not commit,” said Patricia Young, sister of Ledell Lee. “What happened to Debra Reese is horrible, and we keep her family in our prayers. But I was with Ledell the day this murder happened, and I do not see how he could have done this. If Ledell is innocent, then the person who did this has never been caught. All we want is to finally learn the truth.”
The evidence that the legal firms are hoping to test was found at the crime scene and likely belongs to Debra Reese’s killer. It includes hairs from the bedroom where the murder occurred, which the State’s expert testified belonged to a Black person; scrapings from under Reese’s fingernails, which are highly likely to contain her murderer’s DNA; and five fingerprints from key areas of the murder scene.
“Since Ledell’s execution, we have discovered a wealth of new evidence supporting his claim of innocence,” said Nina Morrison, senior litigation counsel at the Innocence Project. “All of this evidence should have been presented to the courts while Ledell was still alive, but it wasn’t because he couldn’t afford a quality defense. We know that 167 people have been exonerated from death row for crimes they did not commit, many after losing decades of their life behind bars. The lack of thoroughness in Ledell’s investigation helps explain how that happens, and we hope the Court will allow us to finally uncover the truth.”
The ACLU, the Innocence Project and a team of volunteer lawyers from Hogan Lovells have spent more than two years since Lee was executed investigating the forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony that was relied on by the State to convict and execute Lee. The results of this investigation include affidavits from some of the nation’s leading forensics experts, and provide strong reason to believe Lee may have been innocent. These affidavits include:
- Dr. Michael Baden, arguably the nation’s leading forensic pathologist, finding that the State fundamentally misinterpreted important evidence about Debra Reese’s injuries and cause of death. Critically, a scrape on her face did not come from the rug she was found on, as prosecutors argued, but rather a shoe. Dr. Baden has compared the soles of the shoes Lee was wearing that day and concludes that they are “incompatible with the injury pattern to Ms. Reese’s face.”
- Footwear examination expert Alicia Wilcox found serious flaws in the State’s claim at trial that two partial shoe prints from the crime scene were the “exact same size” as Lee’s shoes. Dr. Wilcox’s findings seriously undermine the shoe print testimony that prosecutors referred to as a “slam dunk” at trial.
- Dr. Jennifer Dysart, a nationally known expert in eyewitness misidentification, concluded that the eyewitnesses who identified Lee were shown a photo lineup that was “shockling[ly]” biased against him, irrevocably tainting their identifications.
- In addition, today’s filing contains a candid affidavit from Craig Lambert, Ledell Lee’s appellate attorney, who acknowledges that he was struggling with substance abuse, as well as a severe lack of resources, during his defense. His affidavit states: “I recognize the investigation into Ledell’s innocence was not adequate and he deserved far better than the representation I was able to provide him back then.”
“What we see here is unfortunately too common in death penalty cases, especially when a white person has been killed and there is pressure to convict someone for their death,” said Cassandra Stubbs, director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project. “Two of the biggest predictors of a death sentence are racial bias and the quality of counsel. There is tremendous evidence that both of these factors played out in Ledell’s case. He should never have ever been executed under these circumstances.”
To date, 367 innocent people have been exonerated through post-conviction DNA testing similar to what is being requested here. In addition, the Automated Fingerprint Identification System database has increasingly been used to clear the innocent and identify true culprits. In 2019, for example, there were two exonerations of men in Louisiana wrongly convicted of sexual assaults, both of which were made possible by AFIS identifications of new suspects whose prints were stored in the national database.
To read the complaint, click here.
Statement from City of Jacksonville:
Council Members and Mayor,
I wanted to make you all aware of the attached Complaint. Patricia Young, the sister of Ledell Lee, has requested under the Freedom of Information Act that the City turn over physical evidence from her brother’s murder case. However, as I have relayed to her attorney, under current state statutes and case law, the City is prevented from releasing DNA physical evidence.
A.C.A . § 16-43-1101 prohibits the disclosure of genetic information in “any judicial, legislative, or administrative proceedings, …” The exceptions to this rule are: 1) paternity cases; 2) when the individual whose genetic information is a party and the genetic information is at issue; 3) for use in a law enforcement investigation or criminal trial; and 4) the genetic information is for use in a law enforcement investigation where an insurer is reporting fraud or criminal activity. None of these exceptions apply in this instance.
Additionally, although courts have interpreted the Freedom of Information Act broadly, in Nolan v. Little, the Court held that the interpretation is not so broad “as to include any item located within the doors of a state agency that may contain some kind of genetic information.” Ms. Young’s request for DNA physical evidence is similar to the one in Nolan, where the Court found that the request fell outside the scope of FOIA:
a seed sample does not meet the definition of a “public record,” because it cannot be said to be an object “on which records and information may be stored or represented.” Although the list of items that can be mediums is not exhaustive, it does not contain a seed or any other organic object. Moreover, the various items that constitute a “public record” are writings, recorded sounds, films, tapes, electronic or computer-based information, and data compilations in any medium. “Mediums” are paper, microfilm, microform, computer disks and diskettes, optical disks, and magnetic tapes. Giving the words of the statute their plain and ordinary meaning as required by the rules of statutory construction, a seed sample does not constitute a “public record,” nor does it fall within the definition of a medium. This interpretation is consistent with the provisions of the entire Freedom of Information Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-101 et seq., which provides for all public records to be open to “inspection and copying” by any citizen, Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-105 (a)(1). Removal and destructive testing of seed samples go far beyond the inspection and copying of public records.
Lee’s DNA physical evidence is not a public record and is not open to public inspection. Additionally, should the City release this evidence, there is the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed, further violating evidence retention laws.
LITTLE ROCK, Ark.- The Innocence Project and the American Civil Liberties Union will announce Thursday morning what they say is new information and litigation related to the 2017 execution of Ledell Lee.
Lee was executed in April 2017 for the 1993 murder of Debra Reese.
Lee, who was 27 years old at the time of the murder, robbed and strangled Reese, 26, in her Jacksonville home.
He was sentenced to death two years later.
He maintained his innocence until his execution.
The Innocence Project and ACLU were brought in two weeks before the execution.
They say they found flaws in the evidence used to convict Lee and they found DNA evidence that likely belonged to the killer that was not tested with modern technology.
The press conference is Thursday at 10 a.m. at the Darragh Center at the Main Library downtown.
Lee’s brother and sister will be there today.